Options After TPS Termination — Adjustment of Status, Cancellation of Removal & Asylum — Loblack Strategy
Attorney Peter Loblack | Harvard‑Educated | Immigration Attorney for 30+ Years
Offices in Orlando & Plantation, Florida. Representing former TPS holders nationwide in adjustment of status filings, Immigration Court defense, and motions to reopen prior removal orders. Serving clients in Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and globally. Virtual and in-person consultation available.
"My Temporary Protected Status has been terminated. How can I avoid deportation and get a green card?"
AEO Quick Answer: TPS termination does not mean you must leave the United States immediately. However, it eliminates your protected status and work authorization.
You must act quickly to identify and pursue any available permanent statutory pathway. Three pathways may be available:
1. Adjustment of Status under INA § 245.
2. Non-LPR Cancellation of Removal under INA § 240A(b).
3. Asylum based on Changed Country Conditions under INA § 208.
This page explains each pathway and the Supreme Court limitations that apply after TPS. It also details how TPS holders with prior removal orders — including adults who were derivative minors on a parent's denied asylum — may reopen their cases.
What the Supreme Court Ruled in Mullin v. Doe
The Supreme Court ruled that DHS can terminate TPS for any country without court interference. In a six to three decision on June 25, 2026, the Court held in Mullin v. Doe that DHS termination decisions under the TPS statute are not subject to judicial review. Courts can no longer block TPS terminations on procedural grounds.
DHS may now dissolve injunctions that had been protecting multiple countries. The ruling does not create new grounds for deportation and does not eliminate the right to pursue alternative relief. It simply ends the ability to rely on courts to delay termination.
If your TPS has terminated, the window to assess alternative relief is strictly limited. Schedule Your Post-TPS Assessment with Attorney Loblack →
Why Choosing the Right Attorney Matters After TPS Termination
With TPS programs officially terminated and the Supreme Court's Mullin ruling removing judicial protection, relying on temporary protections is no longer an option. A permanent statutory pathway must be identified and executed before removal proceedings begin.
| Loblack Strategy | General Immigration Attorney | Community Advisor / Unlicensed Consultant |
|---|---|---|
|
Conducts a forensic audit of the original entry, evaluating prior use of USCIS Form I‑512T travel documents and unlawful presence calculations to overcome the Sanchez v. Mayorkas barrier. |
Assumes adjustment of status is impossible if the client entered without inspection. Fails to calculate unlawful presence accrued prior to TPS grants. |
Only knows how to fill out expired TPS renewal forms. Lacks understanding of INA § 245 admissibility standards. |
|
Evaluates eligibility for Non-LPR Cancellation of Removal under INA § 240A(b)(1). Begins building the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship record before a Notice to Appear is issued. |
Waits until a Notice to Appear is issued and a hearing is scheduled before looking for a defense strategy. Leaves insufficient time to build the required hardship evidence. |
Cannot represent clients in Immigration Court. Advises clients to ignore authorities entirely. |
|
Analyzes changed country conditions and safe third-country transit rules to apply statutory exceptions to the one-year asylum deadline. This includes addressing the firm resettlement bar. |
Informs clients that they are permanently time-barred from filing for asylum because they have lived in the U.S. for fifteen years. |
Possesses no ability to argue complex statutory exceptions before an Immigration Judge. |
|
Prepares motions to reopen under Matter of Lozada and the changed country conditions exception. Builds the record from the first filing, ensuring the case is prepared for appellate review. |
Often drops the case after a denial. Leaves the client without counsel for the BIA appeal or petition for review deadline. |
Cannot file BIA appeals, motions to reopen, or petitions for review. |
A permanent pathway requires a complete audit of entry history, family situation, and prior proceedings. Schedule Your Assessment with Attorney Loblack →
Supreme Court Reality on TPS and Adjustment
In Sanchez v. Mayorkas, the Supreme Court held that a grant of TPS does not constitute an "admission" into the United States under INA § 245(a). TPS holders who entered without inspection cannot adjust status on TPS alone. The unlawful entry must be independently cured.
How Sanchez v. Mayorkas Affects Adjustment of Status
If you entered without inspection and later held TPS, you cannot adjust status simply because you married a U.S. citizen. Where a prior conditional residence period under INA § 216 exists in the history, that prior admission may support a new adjustment petition. Attorney Loblack analyzes prior I‑512T travel documents, prior visa admission history, and INA § 245(i) grandfathering eligibility.
Adjustment Pathways Remaining Open
Sanchez limits the standard INA § 245(a) path, but it does not close every route. Independent pathways must each be individually assessed. These include a prior lawful admission in the immigration history, CHNV parole entry, INA § 245(i) grandfathering, and VAWA-based adjustment for qualifying victims.
Adjusting Status to a Green Card Inside the United States
Adjustment of status is available inside the United States for former TPS holders who can satisfy the admission requirement. The route to that requirement varies depending entirely on how you entered the United States and what prior immigration history exists.
Lawful Entry Adjustments
If you originally entered the United States lawfully with a visa, you generally meet the inspected and admitted requirement under INA § 245(a). An I‑130 and I‑485 concurrent filing through a qualifying U.S. citizen immediate relative may proceed directly.
The I-512T Travel Strategy
If you entered without inspection but traveled internationally using USCIS Form I‑512T while your TPS was active, your return was inspected by CBP. Under USCIS policy, that inspected return may satisfy the lawful admission requirement for adjustment of status. This potentially cures the Sanchez barrier without consular processing.
The Unlawful Presence Math Trap and I-601A Waivers
Many TPS holders believe their temporary status erased prior immigration violations. TPS only pauses the accrual of unlawful presence; it does not erase the time accumulated before TPS was granted. If you accrued more than 365 days of unlawful presence prior to obtaining TPS, leaving for consular processing triggers the 10-year bar.
In these cases, an I‑601A Provisional Waiver must be filed and approved before departure. This addresses the unlawful presence bars under INA § 212(a)(9)(B) without an extended family separation.
Adjustment Under INA 245(i)
INA § 245(i) allows adjustment of status in removal proceedings for individuals who were the beneficiary of a qualifying petition filed on or before April 30, 2001. Where that grandfathering applies, the unlawful entry bar is overcome subject to a penalty payment.
Non-LPR Cancellation of Removal
Cancellation of removal for non-lawful permanent residents is decided before an Immigration Judge. If granted, it converts the respondent directly to lawful permanent resident status. It is one of the most powerful forms of relief available, and requires substantial evidence.
What Must Be Proven for Cancellation of Removal
Four elements must be established before the Immigration Judge. First, ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States immediately before the NTA was served. Second, good moral character during that ten-year period.
Third, no conviction for a disqualifying offense under INA §§ 212(a)(2), 237(a)(2), or 237(a)(3). Fourth, removal would cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying U.S. citizen or LPR spouse, parent, or child.
Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship
Under Matter of Recinas, the Board of Immigration Appeals applies a totality-of-circumstances analysis. The hardship must substantially exceed what is ordinarily expected from family separation. Standard economic loss or emotional distress is insufficient to meet the standard.
The strongest records document a qualifying relative's serious medical condition that cannot be treated in the country of removal, or a U.S. citizen child's severe educational disruption. Attorney Loblack builds this record using medical evaluations, psychological assessments, and school records.
Notice to Appear and the Stop-Time Rule
The ten-year continuous presence period stops running when a Notice to Appear is properly served under INA § 240A(d)(1). Under Pereira v. Sessions and Niz-Chavez v. Garland, a defective NTA that omits the time and date of the hearing does not stop the clock. This threshold question must be analyzed before making any concession on continuous presence.
Limits on Cancellation of Removal Grants
Non-LPR cancellation grants are subject to a statutory cap of 4,000 per fiscal year under INA § 240A(e)(1). With a large number of former TPS holders placed in removal proceedings, early filing is critical. Cases fully prepared and filed early are best positioned.
Asylum and Changed Country Conditions
Many TPS holders assume that because they have lived in the United States for years, they are time-barred from asylum. Two statutory exceptions preserve asylum as an option regardless of how long a former TPS holder has been in the United States.
Statutory Exceptions to the Filing Deadline
Valid TPS status tolls the one-year asylum filing deadline under 8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5)(iv). The clock restarts when TPS terminates, not from the original entry date. The changed country conditions exception carries no one-year deadline at all, and is a primary route for long-term residents facing newly destabilized home countries.
The Firm Resettlement and Transit Bars
Many former TPS holders lived in a third country (such as Colombia, Chile, or Mexico) before arriving in the United States. The "firm resettlement" bar and safe third-country transit rules can disqualify an otherwise valid asylum claim. This requires advanced legal argument to demonstrate that no permanent residency or safe haven was offered before arriving in the U.S.
Gap Strategy: Maintaining Work Authorization and Driver's Licenses
When TPS terminates, the immediate crisis for many individuals is the loss of work authorization and state driver's licenses. Florida is strictly regulated regarding driver's license renewals for immigrants.
Filing for Cancellation of Removal (Form EOIR‑42B) or Asylum (Form I‑589) in Immigration Court opens new categories of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs), such as the c(10) or c(8) categories. These pending applications allow you to maintain lawful employment and renew your driver's license while the court case proceeds.
Do not let your work authorization lapse. Discuss Your EAD Gap Strategy with Attorney Loblack →
Withholding of Removal and CAT Protection
Where asylum is unavailable due to a prior denial or a statutory bar, withholding of removal under INA § 241(b)(3) and CAT protection under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c) remain available in removal proceedings. CAT is available regardless of criminal history, making it critical protection for individuals barred from other relief.
If asylum is unavailable, withholding and CAT require individual assessment. Schedule Your Assessment with Attorney Loblack →
TPS Holders with Prior Removal Orders
Reopening old removal orders requires specific statutory exceptions. The standard motion to reopen deadline has expired for most TPS holders. The viable routes are narrow, technical, and must be built correctly before filing.
Statutory Routes to Reopen Expired Orders
Four statutory and regulatory routes remain available regardless of when the removal order was issued. First, changed country conditions carry no time bar under INA § 240(c)(7)(C)(ii). Second, lack of proper notice allows rescission of an in absentia order at any time under INA § 240(b)(5)(C).
Third, ineffective assistance of counsel under Matter of Lozada may support equitable tolling. Fourth, the Immigration Judge or the BIA may reopen a case on their own motion under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). This is pleaded in the alternative.
The Changed Country Conditions Exception
The changed country conditions exception is the most durable route available for a TPS holder with an old removal order. For an adult who was a derivative minor on a parent's denied asylum case, this presents an independent claim. They were never individually adjudicated, and country conditions may have materially deteriorated since the original denial.
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims
Where prior counsel failed to file a separate application for the child or failed to identify the child's independent claim, a motion under Matter of Lozada may support equitable tolling of the deadline. Procedural defects in the Lozada motion are themselves grounds for denial.
Sua Sponte Reopening Limitations
Sua sponte reopening is an extraordinary remedy, not a general substitute for missed deadlines. Matter of Herrera-Nunez established that equities accumulated years after a removal order do not constitute the truly exceptional circumstances required. In the Eleventh Circuit, a BIA denial of sua sponte reopening is not reviewable by the courts.
A prior removal order requires immediate legal assessment. Schedule Your Removal Order Assessment with Attorney Loblack →
Mistakes That Affect Chances for Relief
- Waiting for the NTA before seeking counsel. The cancellation of removal hardship record, the asylum changed-conditions evidence, and the motion to reopen documentation take months to build properly. Waiting until removal proceedings begin results in an unsupported application.
- Assuming adult children are protected by your case. TPS holders often have children who received derivative status. Adult children cannot "ride" on a parent's Cancellation of Removal or new Asylum claim. They must qualify for their own independent relief, making family-wide legal assessments critical.
- Failing to secure a gap strategy for employment and licensing. Letting TPS work authorization expire without filing a pending application for Cancellation of Removal or Asylum leaves you vulnerable to job loss and prevents driver's license renewal.
- Ignoring the unlawful presence math. Assuming that 15 years of TPS wiped away the time accrued before TPS was granted. Leaving the United States for consular processing without an approved I‑601A waiver triggers a 10-year bar if you accumulated over a year of unlawful presence before TPS.
- Departing the United States voluntarily. A voluntary departure after TPS termination may trigger the three-year or ten-year bars to re-admission under INA § 212(a)(9)(B). Departure without a full assessment of re-entry consequences limits options.
- Hiding prior third-country residency. Failing to disclose time spent in countries like Colombia or Mexico before entering the United States. The firm resettlement bar will surface during an asylum hearing, and hiding it damages credibility before the Immigration Judge.
- Pleading guilty to misdemeanors. Pleading guilty to offenses involving moral turpitude or controlled substances can bar eligibility for cancellation of removal, adjustment of status, and asylum. Every charge must be reviewed with an immigration attorney before any plea.
- Filing an asylum claim without a legal basis. A late asylum application filed without properly documenting the changed country conditions exception will be denied by the Immigration Judge. The exception requires a specific statutory basis.
- Ignoring a prior removal order. A TPS holder with an old removal order from a parent's denied asylum case must affirmatively address that order. It does not disappear when TPS is granted, and it resurfaces when TPS terminates.
Do not wait for a Notice to Appear to secure a permanent solution. Schedule Your Post-TPS Options Assessment with Attorney Loblack →
Countries Affected by Termination
The following countries have had TPS terminated or targeted for termination as of Mullin v. Doe (June 25, 2026). Effective dates are evolving. Verify current status at uscis.gov before any filing decision.
EAD validity dates under each country designation are shifting rapidly following Mullin. Confirm the current status of your specific designation before relying on any previously issued EAD expiration date.
Terminated / Proceeding Now
- Haiti
- Venezuela
- Honduras
- Nicaragua
- Syria
- Afghanistan
- Cameroon
Terminated / Court Proceedings Ongoing
- El Salvador
- Burma / Myanmar
- Ethiopia
- South Sudan
- Somalia
- Nepal
- Yemen
Myths vs. Realities
| What Former TPS Holders Believe | What Is Actually True |
|---|---|
|
"Because I had TPS for fifteen years, I automatically qualify for a green card now." |
Past TPS provides no automatic path to lawful permanent residence. Adjustment of status, cancellation of removal, or asylum must each be independently qualified for under the INA. |
|
"I married a U.S. citizen so I can adjust my status easily." |
If the original entry was unlawful, Sanchez v. Mayorkas holds that TPS did not cure it. Prior I‑512T travel documents, CHNV parole history, or an I‑601A provisional waiver must be assessed. |
|
"TPS erased the years I lived here unlawfully before I applied." |
TPS only pauses the accrual of unlawful presence. If you accumulated over a year of unlawful presence before getting TPS, leaving the U.S. triggers a 10-year bar unless you obtain an I‑601A waiver. |
|
"When TPS ends, I will immediately lose my driver's license and cannot work." |
Filing for relief like Cancellation of Removal or Asylum opens new EAD categories (such as c(10) or c(8)). This allows you to maintain employment and renew state licenses while proceedings are pending. |
|
"I can't apply for asylum — I've lived here for two decades." |
TPS tolls the one-year filing deadline under 8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5)(iv). The changed country conditions exception carries no one-year deadline at all. Both remain available if properly documented. |
|
"Living in a third country before coming to the U.S. doesn't matter since I have been here so long." |
The firm resettlement and safe third-country transit bars can disqualify an asylum claim. This requires advanced legal analysis and defense to overcome. |
|
"Having a U.S. citizen child guarantees I will win Cancellation of Removal." |
A U.S. citizen child is a qualifying relative, but standard financial hardship is not enough. Exceptional and extremely unusual hardship under Matter of Recinas requires substantial evidence. |
|
"My adult children are protected if I win my immigration case." |
Derivative protections age out. Adult children cannot automatically derive status from a parent's Cancellation of Removal or new Asylum claim; they must seek independent relief. |
|
"The courts will keep blocking TPS terminations." |
The Supreme Court's June 25, 2026 ruling in Mullin v. Doe held that DHS termination decisions are not subject to judicial review. Court protection against TPS terminations is no longer viable. |
|
"My old removal order from my parent's asylum case doesn't affect me — I had TPS." |
A derivative removal order resurfaces when TPS terminates. The adult child was never independently heard on their own asylum claim. That prior order must be affirmatively addressed. |
|
"If I leave the United States now I can come back legally later." |
Voluntary departure after unlawful presence may trigger the three-year or ten-year re-entry bars under INA § 212(a)(9)(B). Departing without a full assessment can permanently close re-entry options. |
Questions Clients Ask
Now that my TPS has ended, do I automatically get a green card
No. TPS was a temporary benefit. It does not provide an automatic path to lawful permanent residence. Adjustment of status, cancellation of removal, or asylum must each be independently qualified for and filed under the INA.
What did the Supreme Court rule in Mullin v. Doe and how does it affect my TPS
On June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled six to three that DHS decisions to terminate TPS are not subject to judicial review. Courts can no longer block terminations on procedural grounds. DHS may now dissolve injunctions protecting multiple targeted countries.
Did the Supreme Court rule that TPS holders cannot get green cards
No. The Sanchez v. Mayorkas decision held that TPS status does not constitute a lawful admission for INA § 245(a) purposes, but it did not ban green cards. Prior I‑512T travel documents, CHNV parole, INA § 245(i) grandfathering, and consular processing with an I‑601A waiver provide independent pathways.
How exactly does unlawful presence math work for TPS holders
TPS pauses the accrual of unlawful presence, but it does not erase the time accumulated before TPS was granted. If you accrued more than 365 days of unlawful presence before obtaining TPS, departing the United States triggers the 10-year bar unless you obtain an I‑601A provisional waiver.
Do I need an I-601A waiver if I have an approved I-130 from my U.S. citizen spouse
If you entered without inspection, lack an I‑512T travel history to cure the entry, and accumulated more than a year of unlawful presence before getting TPS, you cannot adjust status inside the United States. You must process your green card at a U.S. consulate abroad, which requires an approved I‑601A provisional waiver before you depart.
Can I adjust status through my U.S. citizen spouse now that my TPS is terminated
If you originally entered the United States lawfully with a visa, yes. If you entered without inspection, the Sanchez barrier applies. However, prior I‑512T travel documents, prior CHNV parole, or INA § 245(i) eligibility may overcome it.
What is the I-512T travel strategy and how does it help
USCIS Form I‑512T authorized TPS holders to travel internationally and return to the United States during their TPS period. Each return through a port of entry was inspected by CBP. Under USCIS policy, that inspected return may satisfy the lawful admission requirement for adjustment of status.
Can I keep my driver's license after my TPS expires
Yes, if you secure a gap strategy. Filing an application for Cancellation of Removal (Form EOIR‑42B) or Asylum (Form I‑589) makes you eligible for new Employment Authorization Document (EAD) categories. A pending EAD application allows you to renew your state driver's license.
What happens to my work permit when TPS ends
When TPS terminates, your associated work authorization ends. However, filing for Cancellation of Removal or Asylum in Immigration Court opens new EAD categories (such as c(10) or c(8)). These allow you to maintain employment while the court case proceeds.
What happens if I receive a Notice to Appear
A Notice to Appear places you in removal proceedings before an Immigration Judge. It is the formal opening of proceedings in which cancellation of removal, asylum, withholding, CAT protection, and adjustment of status may all be addressed as defenses.
What is Non-LPR Cancellation of Removal and who qualifies
Non-LPR cancellation of removal under INA § 240A(b)(1) is a defense that converts the respondent to lawful permanent resident status. It requires ten years of continuous physical presence, good moral character, no disqualifying criminal history, and proof of exceptional hardship to a qualifying relative.
Can my adult children be included in my Cancellation of Removal or Asylum case
No. Derivative protections age out. Adult children cannot ride on a parent's Cancellation of Removal or new Asylum claim. They must qualify for their own independent relief, which requires separate applications and individualized legal strategies.
Can I apply for Cancellation of Removal if I don't have a court date yet
No. Cancellation of removal under Form EOIR‑42B can only be applied for in active removal proceedings before an Immigration Judge. It cannot be filed affirmatively with USCIS. However, building the hardship record should begin before proceedings are initiated.
What does exceptional and extremely unusual hardship mean
Under Matter of Recinas, the hardship must substantially exceed what is ordinarily expected from family separation and removal. Standard economic loss or emotional distress is not sufficient. The strongest records document a qualifying relative's serious medical condition or severe educational disruption.
Can I still apply for asylum if I have lived in the U.S. for twenty years on TPS
Yes. TPS status tolls the one-year filing deadline under 8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5)(iv), so the clock restarts when TPS terminates. Additionally, the changed country conditions exception applies where the asylum basis arose after entry, which carries no one-year deadline.
What is the firm resettlement bar and how does it affect my asylum case
If you received an offer of permanent resident status, citizenship, or safe haven in a third country before arriving in the United States, you may be barred from asylum under the firm resettlement rule. Overcoming this bar requires demonstrating that your stay was strictly transitional or that your rights were severely restricted in that third country.
Does living in another country before the U.S. affect my asylum claim
Yes. If you lived in a third country before arriving in the United States, the firm resettlement bar and safe third-country transit rules can disqualify your asylum claim. This requires advanced legal analysis and defense to overcome.
I was included as a minor on my parent's asylum application years ago and we were both ordered removed. Can that order be reopened now that I am an adult
Yes, through specific statutory routes. The changed country conditions exception carries no time bar. As a minor derivative beneficiary, you were never independently heard on your own asylum claim. You may assert that independent claim if country conditions have materially deteriorated.
Why is it difficult to reopen an old removal order and what makes it harder in the Eleventh Circuit
The standard motion to reopen deadline is 90 days from the final removal order. Outside statutory exceptions, reopening requires the BIA to exercise sua sponte discretion. In the Eleventh Circuit, a BIA denial of sua sponte reopening is not reviewable by the courts.
Can I leave the United States voluntarily now that my TPS is terminated
Voluntary departure after TPS termination may trigger the three-year or ten-year re-entry bars under INA § 212(a)(9)(B). Departing before assessing unlawful presence, available I‑601A waivers, and any pending relief eligibility can permanently close re-entry options.
Does a criminal record bar all relief after TPS termination
Not categorically. Aggravated felonies under INA § 101(a)(43) bar asylum, withholding, and non-LPR cancellation. Crimes involving moral turpitude may bar adjustment. However, CAT protection under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c) is available regardless of criminal history.
Will paying taxes help my Cancellation of Removal case
Yes. Filing and paying income taxes is a primary component of demonstrating good moral character during the ten-year period under INA § 240A(b)(1). Failure to file taxes during the continuous presence period can result in an Immigration Judge denying relief.
Can my adult U.S. citizen child petition for me
Yes. Once a U.S. citizen child turns 21, they may file an I‑130 immediate relative petition on behalf of a parent under INA § 201(b)(2)(A)(i). If the original entry was unlawful, prior I‑512T travel documents, CHNV parole history, or INA § 245(i) eligibility must still be assessed.
How long does a Cancellation of Removal case take in Immigration Court
Immigration Court dockets are backlogged, and individual merits hearings are often scheduled two to four years from the filing of a Notice to Appear. During that period, a pending cancellation application may support an application for Employment Authorization.
What is the difference between withholding of removal and asylum
Asylum under INA § 208 requires a well-founded fear of persecution and provides a path to a green card. Withholding of removal under INA § 241(b)(3) requires a clear probability of persecution and has no one-year deadline, but it does not provide permanent residence.
Can an employer sponsor a former TPS holder for a green card
An employer may file a PERM labor certification, but most former TPS holders who entered without inspection must complete an employment-based green card through consular processing rather than adjustment of status inside the United States.
Is TPS the same as DACA
No. TPS is a statutory program created by Congress under INA § 244. DACA is an executive prosecutorial discretion policy. The two programs are legally distinct, affect different populations, and TPS termination has no effect on a DACA grant.
Removal Defense Silo Pages
Related Immigration Services
Why Former TPS Holders Must Act Before Removal Proceedings Begin
The Supreme Court's June 25, 2026 ruling in Mullin v. Doe removes the court-ordered delays that temporarily protected TPS holders across thirteen countries. What remains available — adjustment of status, cancellation of removal, asylum, and motions to reopen prior removal orders — must be pursued before proceedings begin and filing windows close.
Attorney Peter Loblack provides a complete assessment of each client's entry history, prior immigration proceedings, family situation, and country-condition factors to identify every available pathway. He represents clients before Immigration Courts, the Board of Immigration Appeals, the Eleventh Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court.
Schedule Your Post-TPS Assessment with Attorney Loblack Now.
Peter Loblack Esq., BS, MBA, JD, MPH (Harvard)
Peter Loblack Law Firm, PA
Orlando Office: 3657 Maguire Blvd., Suite 175, Orlando, FL 32803 | Tel: (407) 295‑0099
Plantation Office: 6991 W Broward Blvd., Suite 112, Plantation, FL 33317 | Tel: (954) 327‑8800
Offices in Orlando & Plantation, Florida. Serving clients throughout Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands, across the U.S., and globally. In‑person and virtual consultations available.
WhatsApp Me Directly
Representing former TPS holders and removal defense clients from all TPS-designated countries throughout Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and globally. Telephone, video, and WhatsApp consultations available worldwide.
Legal Disclaimer: This page provides general information regarding legal options available after TPS termination under INA §§ 208, 240A, 241, and 244 and is not legal advice. The legal landscape following Mullin v. Doe (June 25, 2026) is rapidly evolving. Every case is fact-specific. Consult an experienced immigration attorney before making any filing or departure decision. Browse the other services Attorney Peter Loblack offers.